Opinion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

discernment - Essay Exampleovide the police officers with protection from the retaliation of the surprised residents as they dexterity retaliate in self-defense, to provide the private property with protection from harm, and to safeguard the dignity and privacy of the residents. Considering the details of the Hudson v. Michigan case, it becomes open-and-shut that the police officers did not face retaliation from the residents. They neither damaged any private property of the residents nor harmed the dignity of the residents and particularly Hudson. Although his privacy might be considered intruded into, yet this is balanced out by the fact that policeman Jamal Good did wait for three to five seconds before entering Hudsons home, which can be considered a reasonable time considering the fact that the investigation was made fundamentally to find drugs and firearms that could have easily been enigmatical had the police waited any longer. Besides, the knock-and-announce rule was ne ver employed to protect the personal interest of a resident in hiding the evidence needed by a warrant from the government. If Hudson was granted his appeal, the negative cause of the decision would have far outweighed the positive outcomes and the decision would have led to increased and unreasonable granting immunity of the convicts in the future cases as well.The criminal procedure in the US is derived from a range of good sources that include but are not limited to the US Constitutions baseline protections, solid ground statutes, federal statutes, state and federal rules regarding the criminal procedure, and the federal and state case laws. The criminal procedure in the US has a very rational process of presentation of evidence in which the case is introductory presented by the prosecution in which the prosecution summarizes its arguments through an hatchway statement. The defense in turn might wait for the prosecution to complete its presentation of the case completely or might give its opening statement. The prosecution calls upon the