Should Government Attempt to Control Human Population Growth?

Human universe of discourse grows, and it has been metric that by the year 2050 t here get let come out of the closet be over 9 billion deal in the dry land. As a result of that the totality of land per person volition take aim dropped to less than one firm inch. It is clear that universe crop essential stop in around close future due to various factors (Issitt, 1). Shortage in victuals and water, limited energy, pollution, death of plants and animals, and galore(postnominal) more(prenominal) other shortages go off be count as those factors. Controlling population growth is essential for sever in ally person in the world as it tycoon exploit galore(postnominal) dangerous situations.Each person has to know how exactly dangerous is overpopulation. political sympathies has to stop this growth somehow by educating families around family planning, help women to convey weaken financial progress, make a law to protect ecosystem and keep open il jural immigrants growth. Population growing is real(prenominal) dangerous especially for development countries. Governments of those countries do not have short job, and many another(prenominal) of them use in truth drastically moves. chinaware is one of them, where many kids have been killed, mostly girls.It is requirement to do something to stop population growth, and many people vie how, and what tools should be used to stop this growing. To decrease population government has to produce families nearly family planning. According to the United Nations (UN), the human population has been growing at a rate of over 1. 2 percent, approximately 70 cardinal persons each year. In the early twenty-first century, Africa had the highest see rates in the world due to the infrequent use of contraceptive techniques (Issitt, 1).This means that promoting contraceptive method techniques would drop this rate down. When couples are take a leakn the luck to see how their vainglorious families are aff ecting resources and the environment around the world, government can take down to solve the problem by increasing the availability of birth control. However, this might not be that easy and heretofore government give this chance couples really go away have to use it. There have to be provided control over family size. mainland China as one of the biggest counties in the world deals with the problem of overpopulation.According to Karin Evans One kid-Policy was established in China in 1980 where government wedged a foot into the bedroom door of every household in China Use whatever means you must to reduce the population, moreover do it came the edict (98). The government believes that by fashioning this policy will help to decrease population growth. Also the China leadership believed that fever mouths to feed meant a give chance at prosperity for more people. A rising standard of living meant better odds for political stability and a dedicate for China in the world hierar chy states Karin Evans in The One-Child, Maybe-One-More Policy (97).China is one of the countries where birth control and family planning was not provided to people as supposed to be. preferably of that government allowed the family planning workers to watch women if they are not pregnant. There were likewise given to them permissions but if women became pregnant without it, they were sent to do abortion. Micah Issitt states in his obligate Counterpoint Controlling Population Growth is Essential that Contraception is absolutely necessary for effective population control and must be amply integrated into society if there is to be any hope of reversing these population growth tr closings (4).Both of the author shows how important can be contraception and family planning, as it could prevent things that happened in China. What was happening in China is very awful and sad. It is not understandable how government, who stands for people protection, can in the equal time go against i t. Many women in China follow very old method, such as women should stay home and take dole out of kids and house. What if the government let them work and success? To stop overpopulation government can help women to get better financial progress. This will cause that many women will have to delay having kids.If the government invests in women, give them prospect to expand financially, educationally and socially, women will take an advantage of this. It will give ladies opportunity to control their life, they will be able to make the decisiveness when to have kids, or even have them at all. When women see that opportunity given by government help them get out of poverty, they will work harder to save more money. If they see that those savings works, they will in charter request to save even more. Those savings begets from their thinking that it will give better future for their kids. However, in China not everywhere One Child Policy works.There are some regions where rural peopl es who needed more hands to work the land were allowed to have more than one boor without penalty. In sparsely populated rural areas the policy was two-child policy, even a three-child policy, if a family could show sufficient economic need for another child, or if the area wasnt closely monitored (Evans 104). That means if any regions in China need more hands to work, government allowed parents to have more children. Anyhow, there was too kind of law, that parents should have a boy, because it will take carry on of his parents when they will be old.In addition, girls were not allowed to get a life. In that time, a lot of girls were killed, not only after they were born, but also in some point of their mother pregnancy. Government must be aware of that it cannot take over peoples lives, tell them how many kids they can have, if they can have boys or girls. Rather than that they should invest in women, and help them develop financially. Women knowledge about growing population and efficient development should be put in the first place as soon we might have lack of basic supplies and our ecosystem will be destroyed.Population growth has big impact on our environment. According to the Carrying capacitance Network, the US will lose its ability to export food by about 2030 if current growth trends continue. This would cost us about $40 billion in annual income. If the US population continues to explode, the global parsimony will eventually have a serious problem with add and demand as a result of our enormous per capita consumption of materials (Reynolds). Hinrichsen and Robey in their post in site www. actionbioscience. rg state that soon there will not be decent food as the population growth faster than is able to produce supplies. Fresh water, oceans, seas, forests will notice shortages. This is all caused by people, who need more water, who need more fishes that live in rivers, seas and oceans, who need more wood to produce supplies that are necessary t o live. Issitt mentions The humans is not equipped to handle the growing human population. Only 13 percent of the earth is classified as arable land, and this small share is divided between agricultural territory, human settlements and land set away for preserving ecosystems.There is simply insufficient space to accommodate both a growing human population and the variety of species that depend on the same environmental resources. (2) That means if population will grow, we will not have enough space to build houses as well as place where we can produce food. Government should not allow getting out from water that many fishes. Soon people will have to defend to get food. It is important that government should take fretfulness more about our ecosystem as well as all people. People cannot live without water, but if water is not clear, they cannot live also.Dirty water will cause that people will be having serious health problems or even they will be dying. According to Issitt Popu lation growth increases the potential for direct conflict between humans and other species. Humans kill animals and plants for a variety of reasons, such as for food or resources believed to have pharmaceutic benefits, for sport, and because certain animals and plants are considered dangerous. In each case, a larger population of humans means a larger population of those who want to melt and kill animals or harvest plants from the environment.Again, population growth means more pressure on other species. (3) In other words people will need more food to live which at the end will destroy their environment, and ecosystem will not be able to suffer all species in the world. Government should have control over that as well as over the illegal immigration. Illegal immigration starts to pass serious population problem for USA and government should take care of that. We are already getting short in resources such as water, food, housing, etc. and by adding more people to US population wi ll affect that America will be even more in shortage of this goods.Government has to think how to stop both illegal and legal immigrants grow. It will be easier to deal with number of people that want to come legally here, as there have been already cut number of green card lottery winners. However, it will not be that easy to deal with those who come illegally here. Many of those, whom are already here illegally, have also children who are citizens. According to Jack Martin The United States experience record levels of immigration in the 1990s. Fifteen million immigrants settled in the U. S. legally and illegally during the decade.Factor in their children and the generally higher cornucopia rates among immigrant groups, and this single factor accounts, conservatively, for more than half the astounding 35 million increase in U. S. population in the 1990s. He also states that overpopulation causes that school are overload, health care system is outlet down and transportation is f ailing. Government has to take his position in this yield as this problem will not solve itself. Government is big and powerful institution, that can, and even must, help to decrease population growth.However, we cannot forget about ourselves. Maybe we are not that powerful and big as government, but we can help a lot. One of the things that we can do is to discover that if we cannot support our kids, we should not have them. Nobody wants their kids suffer from having not enough food, water. It might be difficult for people to understand this however, to save what is windlessness available to us, we have to make decision. Government must find out best solution, which will work for environment and for people together.